Mary Anne Evans had at least Nine Pseudonyms: George Eliot (post 4), Mary Ann, Marianne, Marian, Pollian, Clematis, Deutera, Minie, and Polly. Why?
George Eliot’s original name was Mary Anne Evans; her middle name ended with an “e” (1, p. 22).
In addition to George Eliot, she had the following nicknames or pseudonyms:
“Mary Ann, Marianne, or Marian Evans, Pollian (a pun on Apollyon, the Angel of Destruction), Clematis (Mental Beauty), Deutera, Minie, Polly…” (2, p. 452).
These nine nicknames or pseudonyms are fewer than Ernest Hemingway’s twenty-two (see past post), but they are more than enough to put to rest the usual rationalizations for why she persisted in using “George Eliot” long after everyone knew who she was. Evidently, she had more than one "I" or sense of identity, which is the essence of multiple personality.
Indeed, her multiple personality (aka dissociative identity) is well known—although not in those terms—to scholars and biographers. For example, in Fredrick R. Karl’s George Eliot: Voice of a Century (3), the biography’s index includes the following two subheadings under Eliot, George (Mary Anne Evans): “divided nature (dualism)” and “secret self of.”
You might think that mere differences in spelling—Mary Anne, Mary Ann, Marianne, Marian—don’t count. But in multiple personality, that is common:
“…Elizabeth Jane Doe might well have alter personalities with the first names of Elizabeth, Lizzy, Lizzie, Liz, Betsie, Beth, Bets, Jane, Janie, Lizzy-Jane, and so on” (4, p. 116).
1. Rosemarie Bodenheimer. “A woman of many names,” pp. 20-37 in George Levine (editor) The Cambridge Companion to George Eliot. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
2. Sandra M. Gilbert & Susan Gubar. The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination, Second Edition. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1979/2000.
3. Frederick R. Karl. George Eliot: Voice of a Century. New York, WW Norton, 1995.
4. Frank W. Putnam. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder. New York, The Guilford Press, 1989.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.