“When the [New York Times] Book Review Went Really Harsh”: Book Reviews Without Bylines Had Maximized The Negative. How Nasty!
“These reviews all had one thing in common: They weren’t signed, which led — no surprise! — to an abundance of potshots. In fact, it wasn’t until 1924 that the Book Review decreed all reviews had to have bylines.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/27/books/when-the-book-review-went-really-harsh.html
Thus, current book reviews—reviews with bylines—maximize the positive. How nice!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.