BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, February 12, 2017

“Why I Write” by George Orwell (post 2): He is “driven on” and must "efface one's own personality” due to alternate personalities he “can neither resist nor understand”

He converses with, or gets out of the way of (“efface one’s own personality”), alternate personalities (“imaginary persons,” “demon”) who take over and which he “can neither resist nor understand”:

“From a very early age, perhaps the age of five or six, I knew that when I grew up I should be a writer…

“I had the lonely child’s habit of making up stories and holding conversations with imaginary persons…

“…for fifteen years or more, I was carrying out a literary exercise…the making up of a continuous ‘story’ about myself, a sort of diary existing only in the mind…This habit continued till I was about twenty-five…Although I had to search, and did search, for the right words, I seemed to be making this descriptive effort almost against my will, under a kind of compulsion from outside…

“All writers are vain, selfish, and lazy, and at the very bottom of their motives there lies a mystery. Writing a book is a horrible, exhausting struggle like a long bout of some painful illness. One would never undertake such a thing if one were not driven on by some demon whom one can neither resist nor understand…And…one can write nothing readable unless one constantly struggles to efface one’s own personality…”

Pseudonym
Why did Eric Arthur Blair continue to use a pseudonym (George Orwell) after everyone knew who he was?

Judging from what he says about why he writes, the pseudonym would seem to have been an acknowledgement that his regular personality, Eric Blair, was not the personality mainly responsible for his serious writing.

Search “pseudonyms” for past posts on other writers.

1. George Orwell. “Why I Write” (1947), pp. 243-248 in Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four [1949]: Text, Sources, Criticism, second edition, edited by Irving Howe. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1963/1982.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.