BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

MPD Textbooks: — Frank W. Putnam, MD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) (a.k.a. Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), New York, The Guilford Press, 1989. —James G. Friesen, PhD. Uncovering the Mystery of MPD, (includes discussion of demonic possession) Eugene, Oregon, Wipf and Stock Publishers,1997.

Monday, April 5, 2021

“Middlemarch” (post 1) by George Eliot (post 11): Low Expectations for Protagonist; Author’s Male Pseudonym


The beginning of the story, which will introduce the protagonist, Dorothea Brooke, is preceded by a brief “Prelude,” the essence of which is as follows:


“Saint…Theresa’s passionate, ideal nature demanded an epic life…She found her epos in the reform of a religious order…Many Theresas have been born who found for themselves no epic life…only a life of mistakes…Some have felt that these blundering lives are due to the inconvenient indefiniteness [of] the natures of women…Here and there is born a Saint Theresa, foundress of nothing, whose loving heart beats and sobs after an unattained goodness…dispersed among hindrances, instead of centring in some long-recognizable deed” (1, pp. 3-4).


Comment

Mary Anne Evans’s continued use of a male pseudonym—after everyone knew that “George Eliot” was a woman—may not be an example of the “indefiniteness of the natures of women,” but a manifestation of this great fiction writer’s multiple personality trait. (See prior posts, including the one yesterday about her acknowledged “double consciousness.”)


1. George Eliot (Mary Anne Evans). Middlemarch: A Study of Provincial Life [1872]. Edited with Notes by David Carroll. With an Introduction by David Russell. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2019.


Added same day: George Eliot's "Prelude" to Middlemarch may allude to Wordsworth's The Prelude or, Growth of a Poet's Mind; An Autobiographical Poem, Book Second, School-time (1850 version), which includes the following about his double consciousness:


A tranquillising spirit presses now
On my corporeal frame, so wide appears
The vacancy between me and those days
Which yet have such self-presence in my mind,
That musing on them, often do I seem
Two consciousnesses, conscious of myself
And of some other Being.

Wordsworth J, Abrams MH, Gill S (Eds). William Wordsworth The Prelude 1799, 1805, 1850: Authoritative Texts, Context and Reception; Recent Critical Essays. New York, WW Norton, 1979.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.