BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

In a recent post on a book review, I criticized The New York Times for its blind spot for multiple personality, but I should have also praised it and the reviewer for admitting their “bafflement”


“The book brought about a feeling of intense, queasy bafflement. By my own criteria, however, it is a failure, because bafflement is not enough” (1).  Many reviewers would have declared the book profound and not just baffling.


Here is my recent post, which highlights issues that The New York Times and its review should have seen as flags for gratuitous multiple personality, probably indicative of the author’s multiple personality trait:


Monday, January 31, 2022


This Book Review Highlights The New York Times Blind Spot for Multiple Personality issues by never mentioning multiple personality


“An unnamed narrator for unknown reasons finds himself preparing to steal the identity of a man… Alas, before he can, a stranger appears at the door, dragging the narrator off to a psychiatric hospital and the reader into a narrative whose central subject seems to be the instability of the self and the mutable nature of human consciousness. Traumatic (childhood) experiences manifest later in unpredictable ways…” (1).


Also search “namelessness,” “nameless narrator,” and “childhood trauma” for relevant past posts.


1. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/29/books/review/fuminori-nakamura-my-annihilation.html

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.