BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

Psychoanalysis: A Perspective That May Hamper Your Ability to Understand a Person Who Has Multiple Personality

This post discusses Robert J. Stoller’s Splitting: A Case of Female Masculinity. New Haven, Yale University Press, 1973 (Foreword 1997), 393 pages. The book begins:

“What would convince a biologically normal woman that she had a penis?…This is a book about Mrs. G…and the pieces into which she was split…Mrs. G broke almost all of society’s rules. She did what she did to survive…If this required a penis, she acquired one; if it meant creating a second personality, she did…Then, because she wanted help, Mrs. G became a patient at UCLA. I want to tell you what happened.”

Dr. Stoller treated Mrs. G for many years, during which he identified two alternate personalities, “Charlie” and “Carrie,” which Mrs. G had had since childhood (more than twenty-five years before he met her). He saw Mrs. G as split and fragmented, but, to him, multiple personality was only one of a dozen psychiatric diagnoses that Mrs. G had been given over the years, and, from the perspective of psychoanalysis, it was just one of her defenses, not her primary condition.

What is most valuable in this book for readers of this blog are the transcripts of psychotherapy sessions that Dr. Stoller had with Mrs. G.: Dr. Stoller often doesn't know—and doesn't know that he doesn’t know—to what personality he is talking at any given time.

For example, in the chapter on her father, “Mrs. G” tells Dr. Stoller about what a great guy her father was; then on the next page she explains that her father was horrible; and then on the next page she says she doesn’t recall much about him. Dr. Stoller doesn’t realize that the “Mrs. G” of these sessions includes at least three different alternate personalities whom he has never identified.

In many of the book’s transcripts, Mrs. G comes across as smart and well-related. But in some transcripts, she is disjointed and “crazy.” It seems to me that Dr. Stoller is trying to tell it like it was, but that he is also asking for pity, as if he were saying: Look what I had to contend with! This woman could be very crazy! What he apparently didn’t understand is that Mrs. G appears to have had at least a dozen personalities, and when they would all try to talk at once, it would sound disjointed and crazy.

Mrs. G would often mention that, between sessions, she had had episodes of being “crazy.” Dr. Stoller rarely clarifies to what she is referring. In a person with multiple personality, there are many possibilities, including: feeling “crazy” if she has had amnesia for periods of times and so has done things that she doesn’t recall doing; or feeling “crazy” if she has felt like a child when she has switched to a child-aged personality (she is in her thirties); or feeling “crazy” if she experiences emotions or impulses from, or hears the voices of, other personalities, but doesn’t understand that this is what was happening. When Mrs. G mentions to Dr. Stoller that she has felt “crazy,” he is never able to clarify these sources of her distress. Not to mention that her “penis” probably belonged to one of her personalities.

My point here is not to criticize Dr. Stoller personally. This may have been his first multiple personality patient. And the first modern textbook on multiple personality would not be published for another sixteen years (1). I think that Dr. Stoller was very bright and dedicated.

My point is that Dr. Stoller’s psychoanalytic training and perspective—including the concept of “splitting”—blinded him to the probability that Mrs. G had multiple personality disorder as her primary condition. There are some psychoanalysts who are experts in multiple personality, but they are exceptions.

Nevertheless, Dr. Stoller’s book is valuable and fascinating—I recommend it—especially if you read it as though you were doing a literary analysis, and ask yourself: Does “Mrs. G” always talk like she is one and the same character?

1. Putnam FW. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder. New York, The Guilford Press, 1989.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.