BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, May 20, 2014

Garcia Marquez Says That His Use of “Magic Realism” is a Myth and a Misunderstanding

In literary theory, “magic realism” means that the writer of an otherwise realistic story includes fantastic or bizarre elements that he knows couldn’t possibly be true, but which he treats matter-of-factly as though they were, in fact, true.

The writings of Gabriel Garcia Marquez are commonly stated to be among the foremost examples of magic realism. However, Garcia Marquez, himself, denied it. He insisted on…

“…the direct relation between his own novels and his own life: ‘There’s not a line in any of my books which I can’t connect to a real experience. There is always a reference to a concrete reality.’ This is why he has always asserted that far from being a ‘magical realist,’ he is just a ‘poor notary’ who copies down what is placed on his desk” (1, p. 153).

He is saying that all of the magical, impossible things in his books have been based on real, actual experiences of his subjective reality.

Does this mean that he was crazy? No. He knew that these were only subjective experiences.

Does this only mean that he had a good imagination? Not in the usual sense. What we imagine is usually conceived of as things we think of as being only imaginary when we imagine them. In contrast, Garcia Marquez is talking about what, subjectively, to him, felt like a “real experience” at the time.

How real? Perhaps, to borrow a phrase from Toni Morrison, “more real than real.”

1. Gerald Martin. Gabriel Garcia Marquez: A Life. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 2009.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.