BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, July 18, 2014

O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey: Three Reasons the Mother’s Multiple Personality is Missed by Readers, Theatregoers, and Literary Critics

First, there is the red herring of her drug abuse. The fact is, drugs can only mimic isolated components of multiple personality, such as amnesia (alcohol blackouts), changes in behavior (failure to control violent, sexual, or other impulses), and changes in mood (cheerfulness or sadness). Drugs cannot account for the kind of complex changes, back and forth—in sense of identity, memory, behavior, and orientation to past or present—that were depicted in Long Day’s Journey, as quoted in my last post.

Second, the mother’s alternate personalities did not identify themselves with different names. But the obvious reason is that nobody ever asked them who they are and what their name is.

Third, the mother’s behavior was so odd and peculiar that she may have appeared, at least to the intellect, as just plain crazy. But if she were really crazy—psychotic, delusional—then the end of the play, when she comes in carrying her wedding dress, would have struck the audience, and the family, as pitiful and bizarre, not poignant and endearing, as it does.

Unlike people with psychosis, people with multiple personality are emotionally engaging and involving. If O’Neill’s mother was depicted as truly crazy, the audience would feel that the author, especially in that last scene, was holding his crazy mother up to ridicule, and I don’t think the play would have won a Pulitzer and be considered O’Neill’s best.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.