BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Shakespeare’s Hamlet, O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey, Literary Criticism, Literary Madness, and Psychosis vs. Multiple Personality

As discussed in past posts, both Hamlet and the mother in Long Day’s Journey have multiple personality, which is missed by most literary critics and English professors.

Those who have suspected Hamlet’s multiple personality usually cite his changeability and inconsistence. And I applaud them, since one clue to the possible presence of multiple personality is, indeed, a puzzling inconsistency.

However, as noted in a recent post, the strongest evidence for Hamlet’s multiple personality is his hallucination of the Ghost in the bedroom scene, since that type of hallucination is seen only in multiple personality.

But, you might wonder, if that’s true, why hasn’t it been noted before by other psychiatrists? The reason is that most of those other psychiatrists were psychoanalysts. And, as I’ve explained in many posts, Freud and psychoanalytic literary theory have a blind spot for multiple personality.

So, am I saying that literary critics and literature professors should learn about multiple personality? After all, they are not psychiatrists. Isn’t it sufficient for them to speak of literary “madness” and leave it at that?

At the very least, I would urge them to distinguish between two types of “madness” in literature: psychosis vs. multiple personality.

Psychosis (which includes schizophrenia) means having hallucinations and/or delusions, together with an inability to understand why these perceptions and beliefs are not shared by everybody else; in short, an inability to test reality.

Thus, when novelists hallucinate, impersonate, and/or converse with, their characters, it is not psychosis, because novelists—even though, like Toni Morrison, they may describe such experiences as “more real then real”—know very well that it is subjective.

Multiple personality is like the relationship between novelists and their characters, and so it is not psychotic. However, I would distinguish between normal multiple personality and multiple personality disorder. The former may simply be an asset (e.g., in writing novels), but the latter has significant distress and dysfunction, and might benefit from psychotherapy.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.