BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, September 7, 2014

Does the Bible have the Literary Theme of the Double and does it Debate if God has Multiple Personality?

As noted in previous posts: Jesus treats a case of multiple personality in Mark 5:1-20. And William James, in The Varieties of Religious Experience, from a psychological perspective, concludes that our experience of the presence of God may really be our perception of an alternate personality. Of course, not everyone would agree with my interpretation of Mark 5:1-20. And William James continued to believe in God, personally.

The present post is about our image of God, since we are made in God’s image, and therefore our image of God may tell us something about our own psychology. The following quotations are from Benjamin D. Sommer’s award-winning book, The Bodies of God and the World of Ancient Israel (1):

“The bulk of this book is devoted to…demonstrating that in parts of the Hebrew Bible the one God has more than one body (and also, we shall see, more than one personality)…” (1, p. 1).

“God’s body and self have a mysterious fluidity and multiplicity” (1, p. 10).

“Some biblical authors, embracing a theological intuition common throughout the ancient Near East, maintained that…God’s body and self are completely unbounded. For these thinkers, who include the J and E authors of the Pentateuch, God has many bodies, and God’s person finds expression in more than one self, even as the underlying unity of the being called Yhwh endures. Other biblical authors, including those of the priestly and deuteronomic schools, completely rejected this conception. Putting greater emphasis on God’s unity, they insisted that God has only one body and one self” (1, p. 124).

“It is immediately evident that the fluidity traditions from the Hebrew Bible and the ancient Near East found expression in Christianity. The most obvious example of fluidity in Christian thought is the notion of the trinity” (1, p. 132).

Now, I cannot emphasize too strongly that Professor Sommer makes absolutely no reference to the literary theme of the double or to multiple personality. And, no doubt, he and other theologians would find the idea that God has multiple personality to be silly and offensive. So let me make it clear that I am not making that argument. This post and this blog have no theological agenda.

I just find it interesting that an ancient controversy about the nature of God is the same controversy we have about the nature of people. And I wonder if, besides this blog, any other article or book on the literary theme of the double, etc., has mentioned the Bible.

1. Benjamin D. Sommer. The Bodies of God and the World of Ancient Israel. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.