BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, September 4, 2014

Judging by books on writing by writers, writers don’t completely understand how they do it.

Fiction writers know how they get into the right frame of mind to write, and how they engage their voice(s), muse, and characters. Moreover, they have observed life attentively, studied other writers, and practiced writing for decades.

Yet, I have never found a book by a writer that really explained how their mind works during writing. Is this because they are writers, not philosophers? Perhaps. Or because they fear that self-analysis might undermine their creativity? Perhaps.

But if great novelists have multiple personality: Which one of a novelist’s personalities would know enough about all of their other personalities to have a complete understanding of their writing process?

Now, in theory, it would be possible for all of the writer’s personalities to hold a writer’s conference, so to speak—in the writer’s mind—where they could meet and discuss what everyone has been contributing to the writing process. But most writers haven’t done this.

So the books that have been written by writers on writing have left the reader still wondering how they do it.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.