BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

The Imaginary Companion, Playmate, Alter Ego: Multiple Personality is Common and Normal

Most psychiatrists are not interested in imaginary companions, because imaginary companions are normal.

Why are they considered normal?

Because they commonly occur in children who are not mentally ill; that is, in children who do not have a mental condition causing them distress or dysfunction, and who are no more likely than children who do not have imaginary companions to become mentally ill.

Imaginary companions are not, in any fundamental way, different from multiple personality. They are essentially the same.

Two superficial differences between imaginary companions and multiple personality are amnesia and switching. In multiple personality, one personality may have amnesia, a memory gap, for the time that another personality is out. Also, in multiple personality, the person switches from one personality to another.

In regard to the latter, switching happens in children, too; for example, when they become a super hero or a princess for extended periods of time. In this case, it might be more descriptive to call it an alter ego rather than a companion.

As to amnesia, we know that many older children and adults forget (have amnesia for the fact) that they used to have imaginary companions, and we know that they had them only by asking their parents. Whether there are memory gaps during the time that the child has the imaginary companions, I’m not sure children have been carefully asked.

In any case, it is possible that memory gaps only represent a conflict between personalities, and that it is only the degree of such conflicts that distinguishes normal multiple personality from multiple personality disorder. So my guess is that amnesia is present when a child has imaginary companions (normal multiple personality), but that it is more subtle than in multiple personality disorder.

The myth that multiple personality is rare or weird is based on a lack of appreciation for the fact that it is common and normal in childhood. Psychiatrists tend to ignore imaginary companions, because imaginary companions are normal. Psychologists who are experts regarding imaginary companions may be less knowledgeable about multiple personality, and so hesitate to make the connection. And parents just want to be reassured that imaginary companions are nothing to worry about.

I recommend Marjorie Taylor’s Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them (New York, Oxford University Press, 1999). It’s an eye-opening discussion of what’s normal.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.