BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Who wrote The Murder of Roger Ackroyd? Would Agatha Christie have made Marple and Poirot vouch for an unreliable narrator/murderer?

It is unlikely that the same personality who wrote most of Agatha Christie’s novels wrote this one, since both Caroline Sheppard (the prototype for Miss Marple) and Hercule Poirot are employed to establish the credibility of Dr. Sheppard, the narrator/murderer.

Caroline establishes his credibility by knowing him his whole life (they are siblings), and currently living with him, yet detecting nothing more about him than that he is “weak.” Poirot, through most of this novel, refers to him as a substitute Hastings, his former, trustworthy sidekick (like Sherlock Holmes’s Dr. Watson).

Whose idea was it to write a detective novel with an unreliable narrator? It was suggested to Agatha Christie by two people. James Watts said, “Why not have a Watson do the murder?” And Lord Louis Mountbattan “did not merely offer the device but explained exactly how it should be used. Agatha very rarely took advice on her plots…And only she could have pulled it off so completely. Only she had the requisite control, the willingness to absent herself from the authorial scene and let the plot shine clear” (1, p. 155).

My theory is that, when these suggestions were made, they were responded to by one of Agatha Christie’s personalities who, ordinarily, would have taken the role of a villain. In short, this novel was mostly written by the Dr. Sheppard personality, just as it appears to be.

This is not to say that regular Agatha Christie did not also participate. For example, on the first page of the novel, she may have made Dr. Sheppard begin two sentences with the phrase “To tell the truth” (2), which implies that he is a liar.

1. Laura Thompson. Agatha Christie: An English Mystery. Headline Review, 2007.
2. Agatha Christie. The Murder of Roger Ackroyd: A Hercule Poirot Mystery [1926]. New York, Black Dog & Leventhal, [?].

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.