BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, November 28, 2014

Novelist Saul Bellow: Doppelgänger Pseudonym and Paradoxical Memory

I just started reading a highly respected biography of Saul Bellow, but, judging by its index, if I find anything in it relevant to this blog, it will probably mention it only in passing. Here is what I have found so far:

Doppelgänger Pseudonym

“Bellow’s contribution to the December 1936 issue of Soapbox, under the pseudonym John Paul—a misspelling of Jean Paul, the pen name of the nineteenth-century German satirical novelist Johann Paul Friedrich Richter—provided a lively polemical account of the Evanston zeitgeist” (1, p. 48).

The biographer does not pause to wonder what Bellow and Jean Paul (1763-1825) might have had in common. Why would Bellow have considered Jean Paul to be an inspiration or kindred spirit?

Jean Paul was the writer who coined the word “doppelgänger,” a literary metaphor for multiple personality.

Paradoxical Memory

“What was Bellow writing [in his early years]? He later claimed that he couldn’t remember, though ‘it must have been terrible.’ A strange notion: He prided himself on the acuteness of his memory and enjoyed dazzling his brothers with his vivid recollections of long-forgotten details from their Chicago childhood. But when it came to his apprentice work, he didn’t want to remember; it seemed to him, if not shameful, at the very least embarrassing. There are few early manuscripts in Bellow’s archive. The literal evidence has been destroyed” (1, p. 60).

Well, I can see that the biographer has not read my posts on Mark Twain, who had a reputation for having an extraordinarily excellent memory, but who also had a reputation for being extraordinarily “absent-minded.” For example, in one post I told of the incident in which Twain could not remember the location of the house—not far from his own house—of one of his best friends (Twain wasn’t drunk or senile).

The only psychological condition in which you see the paradox of a person’s having both an extraordinarily good memory and—on occasion or regarding certain things—a surprisingly bad memory, is multiple personality. They have a surprisingly poor memory if you happen to be talking to a personality who had nothing to do with what you are asking about.

1. James Atlas. Bellow: A Biography. New York, Random House, 2000.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.