BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, November 17, 2014

Saul Bellow discusses Herzog and Himself in regard to Multiple Personality

In the course of a 1977 interview (1, pp. 140-160), Bellow discusses the title character of his novel Herzog as suffering from the “complexity” and “chaos” caused by containing so many “personae.”

The character makes “an attempt really to divest himself of all of the personae…He’s decided to go through a process of jettisoning or lightening. That’s how I saw the book when I was writing it…Well, it isn’t that he’s a loser. It’s that he’s so chaotic; no woman can stand so much disorder…it’s the chaos, and the complexity of life which would tire a woman out, just trying to follow it. This complexity is intolerable…”

At another point, the interviewer asks about the way some of his characters, at least superficially, resemble Bellow. As most novelists are about this, Bellow is defensive. But, it is interesting, in denying that any of his characters are a copy of himself, the very words Bellow uses imply that he has thought about multiple personality. “Dissociation of personality” is a phrase that Bellow must have gotten from some book or article about multiple personality:

“I would have to suffer from dissociation of personality to be all these people in the books. I can’t possibly be all of them.”

Well, if they all came from him—and, in another interview, he says that he finds his characters; that he doesn’t create them (1, p. 161)—then by his own logic, he would, indeed, have to have multiple personality.

When, in an interview, authors say that their characters are not them, they are telling the truth, in a disingenuous manner of speaking, because the interviewee is the host personality (see blog glossary), while the character is someone else, an alternate personality. That an alternate personality is not a copy of the host personality is the truth.

1. Gloria L. Cronin and Ben Siegel (Editors). Conversations with Saul Bellow. Jackson, University Press of Mississippi, 1994.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.