BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Salman Rushdie’s Interviews: On Autonomous Characters, Theme of the Double, Multiple Personality, and Divided Self in Midnight's Children and Satanic Verses

“Padma is one of my favorite characters in [Midnight’s Children], because she was completely unplanned. In the first version, she appeared as a very minor character in the last fifteen or so pages; then, when the narrator began to ‘tell’ the book, she arrived and sat there, she simply demanded to be told the story and kept interrupting it, telling Saleem to get on with it. She became very important because she literally demanded to be important” (1, p. 14).

“What I meant was that Saleem's whole persona is a childlike one, because children believe themselves to be the centre of the universe, and they stop as they grow up; but he never stops, he believes—at the point where he begins the novel—that he is the prime mover of these great events. It seemed to me that it was quite possible to read the entire book as his distortion of history, written to prove that he was at the middle of it. But the moment at which reality starts to face him it destroys him; he can’t cope with it, and he retreats into a kind of catatonic state or he becomes acquiescent and complacent” (1, p. 41).

“I do find it difficult to start writing until I can hear the people speak” (1, p. 98).

“Many of the characters in [The Satanic Verses] are for a long time not really unitary selves, they’re just collections of selves…And I think that’s also true about people, that we are not unitary selves, we are a kind of bag of selves, which we draw out from; we become this or that self in different circumstances” (1, p. 103).

“I think, like most writers, that I am most completely myself when I write, and not the rest of the time. I have a social self, and my full self can’t be released except in writing” (1, p. 46).

“Then I suppose what I finally understood, which actually let me start writing, was that [The Satanic Verses] is about, unsurprisingly I suppose for me, about divided selves…And I discovered, only now, really, only in the last few weeks when I’ve been obliged to start talking about the book, that I keep doing this, it seems. That it seems to me I’ve done it, if you look at every novel…Doubles, yes…obviously Saleem in Midnight’s Children…And here I am doing it again. I feel ashamed of this…Maybe becoming conscious of it is a way of stopping” (1, p. 90-91).

1. Michael Reder (Editor). Conversations with Salman Rushdie. Jackson, University Press of Mississippi, 2000.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.