BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, March 23, 2015

Rebranding: Why did the DSM change “multiple personality disorder” to “dissociative identity disorder,” since the condition itself was unchanged?

The name was changed in the psychiatric diagnostic manual, the DSM, in 1994. The reason that this blog uses the older term, “multiple personality,” is that it is still the most widely understood term among the general public. Each term has its advantages and disadvantages.

“Multiple Personality” Disadvantages
Back in 1994, the old name had become entangled in the controversies over “repressed memory” and “satanic ritual abuse.” Some misguided therapists had been looking for hidden memories of child abuse as an explanation for everything. And some gullible people thought that there was a massive hidden conspiracy of baby-killing satanists.

Linguistically, “multiple personality” is an oxymoron. By definition, a person can have only one personality.

“Multiple personality” makes some people think that there is alleged to be more than one person, or that one person is actually “possessed” by another person or demon. The term never meant any such thing, but some people misread it that way.

“Multiple personality” suggests something dramatic and histrionic to many people, which is misleading. People with multiple personality usually don’t, overtly, look like they have multiple personality. The regular or host personality may not even know that there are other personalities, per se. And the alternate personalities prefer to remain incognito. This is not to say that the dramatics seen in movies is a myth. It can be that dramatic or even more so, but it is usually not.

“Multiple Personality” Advantages
When identities come out, they may behave so differently from each other that they look and seem like they are actually different people. The identities, themselves, believe that they are different people. And observers may have the uncanny experience that it is like meeting different people. The term “multiple personality” conveys this experience.

“Multiple personality” provides an easy way to refer to people who have multiple personality. A person with multiple personality is referred to as “a multiple.”

And as previously mentioned, after all these years (since 1994), the term is still more widely understood among the general public than is “dissociative identity.”

“Dissociative Identity”
This term was conceived to avoid the disadvantages noted above for “multiple personality.” It conveys the idea that the person is divided, not multiplied. The person’s personality is the sum total and combination of all the identities put together. “Dissociative identity” is conceptually correct, but it has never really caught on, because it does not convey the experience in the way “multiple personality” does.

“Multiple Identity”
This is the term that I would prefer, which is why I have called my literary theory, “Multiple Identity Literary Theory” (search it in the blog).

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.