BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, April 25, 2015

Edith Wharton: More on the writing process and her autonomous characters, who came from nowhere, spoke to her with their own voices, but were controlled by her critical attention

“When Wharton talked in old age about her writing methods, she said (as many novelists do) that her characters ‘arrived,’ ‘coming seemingly from nowhere,’ complete with their names. They ‘then began to speak within me with their own voices.’ It sounds from this as though she subscribes to the idea of the writer as a kind of unconscious medium, through which the narrative flows onto the page. But she also says, firmly, that her characters never ‘walk away with the subject’: she knows ‘from the first exactly what is going to happen to every one of them.’ So she describes a double operation (which parallels the mixture of cool analysis and deep emotion in her fiction). The process of writing ‘takes place in some secret region on the sheer edge of consciousness’ but ‘is always illuminated by the full light of my critical attention’ “ (1, p. 176).

The biographer, Hermione Lee, is, of course, quite right when she says that what Wharton says is the same thing that many novelists say. I have quoted a number of novelists in this blog saying the same thing.

Novelists see and hear their characters just like Hamlet saw and heard his late father in the famous bedroom scene (Act 3, Sc 4), cited in my post of August 1, 2014. This is the way that people with multiple personality sometimes see and hear their alternate personalities.

And neither Wharton nor Shakespeare—who, I am guessing, like Wharton, had had such subjective experiences—were psychotic. They had a normal, creative version of multiple personality.

1. Hermione Lee. Edith Wharton. New York, Vintage Books, 2008.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.