BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, May 22, 2015

Doris Lessing’s “To Room Nineteen”: In Multiple Personality, “Persecutor Personalities” are Well-Known to Commit “Internal Homicides” in Apparent Suicides

Especially in view of the surprising popularity of my past post on this short story, I should elaborate on my interpretation: that what seems like a suicide may have been a “homicide” committed by an alternate personality against the host personality.

My interpretation is not a fanciful idea that I just made up for “To Room Nineteen.” I have worked with persecutor personalities in my treatment of patients with multiple personality, and they are common knowledge in the multiple personality literature:

“At least half or more of MPD [multiple personality disorder] patients have alter personalities who see themselves in diametric conflict with the host personality. This group of alter personalities, sometimes referred to as ‘internal persecutors,’ will sabotage the patient’s life and may inflict serious injury upon the body in attempts to harm or kill the host or other personalities. They may be responsible for episodes of self-mutilation or for ‘suicide’ attempts, which are actually ‘internal homicides’ as persecutor personalities attempt to maim or kill the host. The perceived degree of separateness that allows one personality to believe that it can kill another personality without endangering itself has been labeled a ‘pseudodelusion’ by Kluft and a form of ‘trance logic’ by Spiegel.

“Some persecutor personalities can be recognized as ‘introjects’ of the original abuser(s); others have evolved from original helper personalities into current persecutors. Typically, they strike a contemptuous or condescending attitude toward the therapist and often actively seek to undermine treatment. In spite of their history of hostile behavior toward the patient as a whole and their negative reactions toward the therapy, they can be won over and enlisted in the patient’s struggle to improve the quality of his or her life. In their anger, they contain much of the energy and strength that an MPD patient needs to survive and improve” (1, pp. 108-109).

1. Frank W. Putnam, MD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder. New York, The Guilford Press, 1989.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.