BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

Scientific Skeptics now say that Multiple Personality “exists,” that it is “genuine,” and that it is “typically not faked or intentionally produced”

Emotional skeptics like Allen Frances, M.D., call multiple personality “bunk” and a “hoax” (see recent post). But scientific skeptics now acknowledge that multiple personality exists and is genuine.

“There is little dispute that DID [dissociative identity disorder, also known as multiple personality disorder] ‘exists’…even…skeptical researchers believe that DID is ‘genuine’ in the sense that its signs and symptoms are typically not faked or intentionally produced…” (1, p. 122).

“The central question at stake therefore is not DID’s existence but rather its etiology…some researchers contend that DID is a spontaneously occurring consequence of childhood trauma, whereas others contend that it emerges primarily in response to suggestive therapist cuing, media influences, and broader sociocultural expectations” (1, p. 122).

Although these skeptics prefer the sociocognitive model to the trauma model, they have an open mind, because their sources of evidence for the sociocognitive model “do not imply, however, that DID can typically be created in vacuo by iatrogenic or sociocultural influences…Therefore, it seems plausible that iatrogenic and sociocultural influences often operate on a backdrop of preexisting psychopathology, life stressors, and genetic influences…[Moreover, their preference for the sociocognitive model] does not imply…that the [childhood trauma model] has been falsified or should be abandoned…Indeed, some important aspects of these two models may ultimately prove commensurable” (1, pp. 141-142).

In short, the only things that these skeptics are absolutely sure of is that multiple personality “exists,” that it is “genuine,” and that it is “typically not faked or intentionally produced.”

1. Scott O. Lilienfeld, Steven Jay Lynn, Jeffrey M. Lohr (Editors). Science and Pseudoscience in Clinical Psychology, Second Edition. New York, The Guilford Press, 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.