BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, July 15, 2015

Sarah Hepola’s Blackout (post 2): Quotations of passages mentioning that the author heard voices—neither psychotic nor alcoholic—as do many writers

As seen in the quotations below, Ms. Hepola heard voices, which were neither psychotic nor alcoholic. They were not psychotic, because, no matter how real they seemed to her, she nevertheless had intact reality-testing, which is psychiatric jargon meaning that she knew the voices were subjective. The voices were not caused by the alcohol, but were the voices commonly heard by many writers: search “voice” for my May 4, 2014 post on the writer’s voices.

“I think I knew I was in trouble. The small, still voice inside me always knew” (1, p. 11).

“…the pendulum could swing inside my brain all night: I will, no I won’t; I should, no I can’t. I drank to drown those voices…” (1, p. 22).

“The wine turned down the volume on my own self-doubt, which is what a blocked writer is battling: the bullying voices in her head…my inner critic…Sometimes…I would drink myself blind…I’d find myself reading over the words later and thinking: Wow, this is pretty good. I didn’t even know I thought that…They had the last-call honesty of someone pulling the listener close. We only have a few more minutes. Let me tell you everything” (1, pp. 86-87).

“I woke up at 5 am each day, chest hammering with anxiety, and crawled into the closet for a few hours to shut out unpleasant voices…I liked how the voices in my mind stopped chattering the moment the doorknob clicked” (1, p. 134-136).

Recalling an experience when she was 14: “I’d had three wine coolers before we went into the room, not enough to black out but enough to have a warm buzz…I remember lying on the floor…and the voice screaming in my brain: Am I having sex right now?” (1, p. 201).

“Alcohol…silenced my inner critic…I even loved writing hungover, when I was too exhausted to argue with myself…(1, p. 205).

Readers who do not have multiple personality, and who don’t know that many writers do, mistakenly think that such references to hearing voices are metaphors. But they are not metaphors. They describe the writer’s subjective experience of autonomous characters, narrators, alter egos, voice, inner critic, shadow, alternate personalities; call them what you will.

1. Sarah Hepola. Blackout: Remembering the Things I Drank to Forget. New York, Grand Central Publishing, 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.