BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, September 23, 2015

Daniel Halpern’s Who’s Writing This?: Fifty-five writers are coaxed by their editor to publicly acknowledge a nonclinical version of multiple personality

Multiple personality is implicit in the title, “Who’s Writing This?” It implies that the creative writing is done by a secret, second self, and not by the regular, social self to whom it is attributed.

Daniel Halpern in his Preface asks “Who is doing the writing?…using as prototype the signature Borges mini-essay, ‘Borges and I’…We meet…the writers we always thought were singular entities…”

Is it all just “spoof and play”?

“Well,” says Halpern, “the fiction throughout the essays is not so much in the writing as in the attribution.”

The fifty-five writers include two mentioned in this blog, Margaret Atwood and Joyce Carol Oates. And while some writers do give the impression that they are joking, others, like John Updike, straightforwardly describe distinct differences between their writing and social personalities; for example, in his case, the former “stutters” and the latter is “suave.”

Since the book uses euphemism, and does not refer to multiple personality by name, Halpern and the writers may be in denial. Nevertheless, some of the writers are clearly describing a nonclinical version of multiple personality.

Daniel Halpern (Editor). Who’s Writing This? Fifty-five Writers on Humor, Courage, Self-Loathing, and the Creative Process. New York, ecco Harper Perennial, 1995/2009.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.