BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, November 16, 2015

Orhan Pamuk’s The Black Book (post 2): Its theme of the double—literary metaphor for multiple personality—probably reflects the author’s own psychology.

According to the novel, the gist of its plot is as follows:

“Just before his wife left him, he’d written a novel (his readers called it ‘historical’) about a man who changed places with his double. Later, after his wife left him and he forced himself to become the man he’d once been so as to sleep in peace, he became the man who had written that novel, and when he became the man he’d once been, he was blind both to his future and his own, and he found himself writing his novel about the doubles all over again! It was not long before this world—where everything was a copy of something else, where people were at once themselves and their own imitations, and all stories opened out into other stories—grew to look so real that the writer, thinking no one would want to read a story in a place this ‘realistic,’ decided to invent another, surreal world that might be more fun to write about, and that his readers might enjoy even more…And because everyone can remember being ‘abandoned for no reason.’ Galip imagined they were all curious to know why this particular writer’s wife had left him” (1, p. 165).

Is this psychologically autobiographical, a reflection of the author’s own mind, beginning in childhood (when multiple personality starts)?

The protagonist’s identity-switching (and perhaps the author’s own) did, indeed, start in childhood:

“As a child he’d often imagined himself shedding his body and his soul to become someone new…” (1, p. 224).

However, the author never mentions multiple personality, per se, which, after all, is the psychological condition that corresponds to the theme of the double and to personality-switching since childhood.

And, according to Multiple Identity Literary Theory, when a novel has unacknowledged multiple personality, it probably reflects the author’s own psychology, which would put Orhan Pamuk in the company of many other writers, including other Nobel Prize winners previously discussed in this blog.

1. Orhan Pamuk. The Black Book [1990]. Translated by Maureen Freely. New York, Vintage/Random House, 2006.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.