BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, April 3, 2016

The Myth of Experimental Literature: Luigi Pirandello’s “Six Characters” and Virginia Woolf’s Six “Waves” explained in Dashiell Hammett’s “Maltese Falcon”

Whether experimental literature is a myth depends on what you mean by experimental. If all you mean is that a writer has done something different, then of course there has been such literature. But if you mean that a writer has deliberately designed a new way of writing, then, in many cases, you are misrepresenting their creative process.

My two recent posts on Pirandello’s Preface and Woolf’s “The Waves” (in the context of prior posts on Woolf) show that the play and novel reflect the authors’ multiple personality, not a desire for experimental technique.

This reminds me of two things: first, the scene in the movie “The Wizard of Oz” when the wizard is discovered behind the curtain; second, a sentence in Dashiell Hammett’s “The Maltese Falcon” (the book, not the movie), which I quoted in a past post (search Hammett), in the section on Flitcraft’s Fugue: “He felt like somebody had taken the lid off life and let him look at the works.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.