BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, July 16, 2016

“A Tale of Two Cities” by Charles Dickens: Famous opening—“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…”—a prelude to Theme of the Double.

“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to Heaven, we were all going direct the other way…”

When I first read this novel many years ago, I read this opening as an eloquent, clever statement of a timeless truth. And it is.

Nevertheless, it is not how most people think. Most people, if asked what kind of times we are living in, would say that it was predominantly good or predominantly bad, or a mixture of good and bad; whereas Dickens says it is both very good and very bad, a contradiction (typical of multiple personality, since each personality has its own opinion).

Dickens’s opening lines are as if two persons—one an optimist, the other a pessimist—were issuing a joint statement: two persons or one person with multiple personality.

Indeed, even before the opening lines, there is the duality of the title, which seems natural enough, considering the story, but it was not the only title that Dickens could have used.

It may not be fair to read deep meaning into every word in a novel, but the title (if chosen by the author) and opening lines are among the least inadvertent.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.