BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Dickens’ (post 6) “Tale of Two Cities” (post 4): Eminent neurologist in British Medical Journal says Dr. Manette is accurate portrayal of multiple personality disorder.

From what I see in Wikipedia and online, many people may be reading and teaching A Tale of Two Cities without realizing that Dr. Manette has multiple personality (the mental illness, inadequately treated, not the normal version). So when I say that Dr. Manette has multiple personality, you might want a second opinion, which follows:

Dickensian Diagnoses
by Sir RUSSELL BRAIN, Bt., D.M., LL.D.
D.C.L., P.R.C.P.
Physician to the London Hospital and the Maida Vale
Hospital for Nervous Diseases
Br Med J. 1955 Dec 24; 2(4955): 1553–1556.

[The following is a direct quote from pages 1555-1556.]

Multiple Personality
Perhaps the most remarkable example of Dickens's psychiatric
insight is the case of Dr. Manette in A Tale of Two
Cities. It is remarkable for the accuracy of his account
of a case of multiple personality and loss of memory,
because it is the most comprehensive of his studies of
psychological abnormality, and because it includes an anticipation
of psychotherapy. Dr. Manette had been imprisoned
for many years without trial in the Bastille during the French
Revolution. As a prisoner he had been a shoemaker, and
after his release he lived in a garret in Paris and spent his
time working at a low bench making shoes. Subsequently
he went to London, but had lost his memory for a long
period of his life. He said: "My mind is a blank, from
some time-I cannot even say what time-when I employed
myself, in my captivity, in making shoes, to the time when
I found myself living in London with my dear daughter
here. She had become familiar to me, when a gracious God
restored my faculties; but, I am quite unable even to say
how she had become familiar. I have no remembrance of
the process." Dr. Manette had long given up his shoemaking
and was practising in London when his daughter's
marriage brought about a relapse. No sooner had she gone
away with her husband than the doctor was found back at
his shoemaking and unable to recognize his friends. He
remained in this state for ten days, and then he was found
one morning with the shoemaker's bench and tools put aside
in his usual morning dress. "He at first supposed that his
daughter's marriage had taken place yesterday. An incidental
allusion purposely thrown out, to the day of the
week, and the day of the month, set him thinking and counting,
and evidently made him uneasy.”

His friend Mr. Lorry now embarked upon the psychotherapy.
He thought it best to present Dr. Manette's case
to himself as though it was that of a patient. He described
to Dr. Manette someone who had had a great mental shock
and who had suffered from a relapse. He led him gradually
to the recognition that the case was his own and then asked
him " 'to what would you refer this attack?' 'You have
no idea,' said Dr. Manette, 'how such an apprehension
weighs on the sufferer's mind, and how difficult-how almost
impossible-it is, for him to force himself to utter a word
upon the topic that depresses him.' ' Would he,' asked
Mr. Lorry, ' be sensibly relieved if he could prevail upon
himself to impart that secret brooding to anyone, when it
is on him?' 'I think so. But it is, as I have told you,
next to impossible. I even believe it-in some cases-to be
quite impossible.'" But by degrees the resistance is overcome,
Dr. Manette's analysis proceeds, and he is led to
regard his shoemaker's bench as a symbol both of the past
and of his neurosis, and to agree to its destruction. "Very
strange," says Dickens, "to see what a struggle there was
within him." But although Dr. Manette was relieved he
was not cured, and he relapsed again when he failed to
rescue Darnay from the guillotine at the trial in Paris. He
disappeared, wandered about, and when he came back
demanded his shoemaker's bench. He was back in the past.
"Time presses: I must finish those shoes." This time the
relapse was permanent, and the last we see of Dr. Manette
is as a "helpless, inarticulately murmuring, wandering old
man."

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.