BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, July 4, 2016

Wisdom, Human Nature, Personal Identity, Multiple Personality, and the Universal Truth, Part A: People are Basically the Same, Part B: People are Basically Different.

Prejudice misapplies Part B.

Overgeneralization misapplies Part A.

Wisdom is the appropriate application of both parts A and B.

In regard to personal identity, most people apply Part A: they think that everyone has the same kind of sense of personal identity that they do.

If they have a single sense of identity, they can’t believe that anyone could really have multiple personality. If they have multiple personality (and if they know it), they feel that everyone else probably does, too, but that many people are either not self-aware or simply don’t want to admit it.

A related example is hearing non-psychotic, rational voices—or having non-self or other-self thoughts—in one’s head. People with multiple personality, who experience this occasionally or even routinely (it is the voices and thoughts of their alternate personalities), think that everyone probably has the same thing, but that many people are either not self-aware or simply don’t want to admit it.

After all, they think, if everyone did not have this kind of experience, why would there be such common expressions as hearing “the voice of reason” or the “voice of conscience”? Don’t all normal people hear the voices of reason and conscience?

But the fact is that people without multiple personality, many of whom are quite reasonable and moral, do not have this kind of subjective experience.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.