BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, September 9, 2016

Mental Status Exam in “The Psychiatric Interview for Differential Diagnosis” by Jansson & Nordgaard of Denmark does not screen for dissociative identity.

The reason that most clinicians in the USA and around the world think they have never seen a case of multiple personality (dissociative identity) is that they evaluate memory like this new textbook from Denmark:

“Memory can be divided into short-term and long-term memory…Memory disturbances can be separated into those that are psychogenic (also occurring in healthy people) and those that are of organic origin. The amnestic syndrome, a disorder characterized by systematic and extensive loss of long-term memory, can be caused by head injury, alcohol, drugs, or other organic noxae…Psychogenic amnesia is a sudden amnesia occurring during periods of extreme psychotrauma…” (1, p. 85).

The above fails to ask the basic screening question for multiple personality:

Have you ever had memory gaps (not caused by head injury, alcohol, drugs, or other organic causes)? This one little question is all that most clinicians need add to their routine mental state evaluation.

If the answer to the above is positive, you might ask: Does anything ever happen that nobody else could have done, but you don’t remember doing it? Are there any significant events (weddings, sexual encounters, etc.) that you don’t remember, or have less memory of than you would expect to have? Do you ever find things in your possession (clothing, writing, etc.) that you can’t account for? Have you ever found yourself somewhere, but didn’t remember how you got there? Do people ever refer to things (conversations, etc.) that they assume you recall, but you don’t? Have you ever been accused of doing things that you didn't recall doing (and if you denied it, they thought you were a liar)?

I should mention that even if you ask all these questions, you will still miss at least a third of patients with multiple personality, because many multiples are quite bright, will guess what you are asking about, and purposely answer with a false negative. Why? Because alternate personalities think it’s none of your business, and host personalities fear it.

For further discussion, search “mental status” and “memory gaps.”

1. Lennart Jansson, Julie Nordgaard. The Psychiatric Interview for Differential Diagnosis. Switzerland, Springer, 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.