BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, October 27, 2016

Self-Assessment for Aspiring Novelists: Read how one hundred great novelists think, to see if your mind works that way and if writing is for you.

Reading all eight hundred posts in this blog (written since 2013) will not make you a great novelist. But it might help you decide whether you have the potential to be a great novelist.

Before I did the reading for this blog, I had assumed that writers’ minds were basically like everyone else’s. Perhaps, as I had heard, they had more depression, bipolar disorder, and drinking. Perhaps they were highly imaginative. Perhaps they were a little eccentric. But wasn’t the main thing that they loved to write and had devoted themselves to it? Couldn’t anyone with the same love and devotion be a great writer, too?

What I found is that writers—according to what they have said about themselves, and how this is reflected in their writing—do not think like everyone else.

But neither are they freaks of nature. My guess is that about 30% of the general public thinks the same way that writers do, and that people from that 30% self-select themselves to become writers, resulting in 90% of writers’ thinking that way (a normal version of multiple personality).

Why 90%? Why not 100%. Two reasons. First there is the study of fifty writers by Marjorie Taylor et al, cited in this blog. Second, I just assume there must be some novelists who don’t think that way.

Where do I get the 30% figure? That is more of a guess. First, since novelists have to come from somewhere, there must be a pool of people in the general public who think the same way. Second, surveys find that a surprising number of people believe in angels, etc. Third, imaginary companions (similar to multiple personality) are common in childhood (although not everyone who had them remembers it). Fourth, the antecedent of multiple personality, childhood trauma (of various kinds and degrees) is relatively common.

I have addressed this post primarily to aspiring novelists rather than to great novelists, because there are more of the former than the latter. However, this blog may also be of interest to writers who have already proven themselves. They might like to know whether, and to what extent, other writers think the way they do.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.