BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, December 12, 2016

“The World Is What It Is: The Authorized Biography of V. S. Naipaul” by Patrick French disparages Naipaul (post 5) on its front and back covers.

The photograph on the front cover appears to show Naipaul in the process of tying the lace of his right shoe, while he stands on his left leg. At first, I thought the photograph was complimentary, a small demonstration of athletic prowess. But then I noticed that the sole of Naipaul’s right shoe has something sticking to it or perhaps even a hole. And the photograph is credited to Lord Snowden, whose only mention in the biography is as follows:

“ ‘What is more,’ V. S. [Naipaul] shouted, his slim frame trembling with irritation, ‘I do not like the photographs taken by that jumped-up little photographer of the Sixties.’ He was referring, of course, to Lord Snowden” (1, p. 392).

The back cover has eight blurbs, including this one by Paul Theroux:

“[An] astonishing biography…It seems I didn’t know half of all the horrors.”

Ten years earlier, Theroux had written a memoir (2) of his soured friendship with Naipaul. It had been reviewed as unfairly negative. And the new biography does say that Theroux’s memoir contains factual errors. But the inclusion of Theroux’s comment on the back cover of the authorized biography seems like Theroux’s ultimate vindication and Naipaul’s ultimate comeuppance.

I will see if Theroux’s memoir, Sir Vidia’s Shadow, has anything of interest here.

1. Patrick French. The World Is What It Is: The Authorized Biography of V. S. Naipaul. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 2008.
2. Paul Theroux. Sir Vidia’s Shadow: A Friendship Across Five Continents. New York, Houghton Mifflin Company, 1998.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.