BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, January 6, 2017

“Kim” (post 2) by Rudyard Kipling (post 5): “a demon in Kim woke up and sang with joy” as he assumed clothes, speech, and gestures of alternate personalities.

In Chapter 9, Kim meets Lurgan Sahib, who is in charge of helping spies to assume their various new identities.

Kim is compared to another boy who works for Lurgan, but who, unlike Kim, does not have what it takes to assume alternate identities:

“The [other] child played this game [of assuming alternate identities] clumsily. That little mind…could not temper itself to enter another’s soul; but a demon in Kim woke up and sang with joy as he put on the changing dresses, and changed speech and gesture therewith” (1, pp. 134-135).

Why can’t this other boy assume alternate identities. Can’t he remember what to do? Can’t he follow Lurgan’s suggestions? The chapter answers both of these questions.

The other boy is demonstrated to have an excellent memory, just as good as Kim’s. And he is demonstrated to be much more suggestible than Kim. So if an excellent memory and compliance with suggestions were keys to adopting alternate identities, the other boy would have been very good at it. But he lacked the ability “enter another’s soul” (switch identities) that Kim had.

The narrator attributes Kim’s ability to switch identities to spirit possession—“a demon in Kim”—a nonpsychological explanation for multiple personality.

Search “spirit possession” for past posts on its relation to multiple personality.

1. Rudyard Kipling. Kim [1901]. New York, W.W. Norton, 2002.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.