BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, January 16, 2017

“The Story of Ruth” by Morton Schatzman, M.D. (post 2): Ruth is talented, not crazy, and the psychiatrist is surprised to hear what she wants to be.

As I noted in the previous post, Ruth’s multiple personality was evident, but Dr. Schatzman had made no mention of it, which is not surprising, since he wrote his book prior to the publication of DSM-III (1980), the first edition of the psychiatric diagnostic manual to clearly describe the diagnostic criteria. And it was still a decade before the first modern textbook on multiple personality (Putnam, 1989).

When Dr. Schatzman finally does raise the issue of multiple personality, he does so as an aside (1, p. 168), and quickly drops it, since he is not sure of Ruth’s diagnosis, and feels that psychiatry must “await further understanding of…cases of multiple personality” (1, p. 171).

Indeed, his failure to diagnose multiple personality in this case is one reason I recommend the book. It eliminates the possibility that the doctor’s interest in multiple personality influenced the patient. Not only is Dr. Schatzman neither experienced with, nor particularly interested in, multiple personality, he never even raises the issue with his patient.

Nevertheless, much of what Dr. Schatzman does in his therapy and study of Ruth’s “apparitions” is the same as he might have done if he had known he was treating multiple personality. You can read how he helps Ruth turn her symptoms, and fears of being crazy, into a talent she is proud of, and self-understanding.

“Where do we go from here?” [Ruth asks Dr. Schatzman]…
“I’m going to write up what’s happened so far. After you and my colleagues have read it and responded to it, we’ll see.”
“It would make good material for a biography of me. I’d like to try writing one. I’ve wanted to be a writer for a long time” [Ruth says] (1, p. 284).

What a coincidence.

1. Morton Schatzman, M.D. The Story of Ruth. New York, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1980.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.