BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, January 20, 2017

“Youth” by J. M. Coetzee (post 4): Memoir’s narrator says protagonist thinks “To know one’s own mind too well spells the death of the creative spark.”

This is the full quotation:
“Usually he does not know his own mind, does not care to know his own mind. To know one’s own mind too well spells, in his view, the death of the creative spark” (1, p. 232).

Before reading the above (I’m still reading Youth), I had come to a similar conclusion about writers' beliefs on creativity in a recent post:

A number of writers have acknowledged that they have more than one self, at least two—a regular self and a writing self. Some writers have said that you cannot interview the one who actually wrote their books. Many writers claim that they have co-writers or ghost writers of one sort or another: muses, voices, daemons, shadows, the unconscious, narrators, and their characters, themselves.

But these same novelists object if I call the above a normal version of multiple personality, because that makes their creative process sound too rational, too explainable. And if there is one thing about their creative process that they are sure of, it is the mystery at its heart.

Could I be right? Or is Coetzee saying something that writers believe only in their youth?

1. J. M. Coetzee. Scenes from Provincial Life: Boyhood [1997], Youth [2002], Summertime [2009]. New York, Penguin Books, 2011.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.