BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, February 13, 2017

“Nineteen Eighty-Four” by George Orwell (post 3): In Chapter One, Winston Smith’s alternate personality writes “Down With Big Brother” in his diary.

Winston Smith, the protagonist, begins a diary, about which, two things—the origin of what he writes and his handwriting—are specified: 
1. “The actual writing would be easy. All he had to do was to transfer to paper the interminable restless monologue that had been running inside his head, literally for years.” 2. “His small but childish handwriting straggled up and down the page, shedding first its capital letters and finally even its full stops” (1, p. 7).

The origin of the content of Winston Smith’s diary recalls what George Orwell had written in his essay “Why I Write” (see previous post), which I again quote: “…for fifteen years or more, I was carrying out a literary exercise…the making up of a continuous ‘story’ about myself, a sort of diary existing only in the mind…This habit continued till I was about twenty-five…Although I had to search, and did search, for the right words, I seemed to be making this descriptive effort almost against my will, under a kind of compulsion from outside…”

In the novel, why is Winston Smith’s style of handwriting specified? Because seven pages later, his handwriting changes: “His eyes refocused on the page. He discovered that while he sat helplessly musing he had also been writing, as though by automatic action. And it was no longer the same cramped awkward handwriting as before. His pen had slid voluptuously over the smooth paper, printing in large neat capitals— DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER” (1, p. 14).

Thus, in both Orwell’s nonfiction essay and his novel, writing is described as not being under the control of the person’s regular personality; rather, it is “against my will, under a kind of compulsion” and “by automatic action.”

Indeed, the novel takes this two steps further. Winston Smith has amnesia, a memory gap, for having written “DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER.” And he writes it in a different handwriting.

These things—automatic (nonvolitional, involuntary, dissociated) writing, amnesia, and a change in handwriting style—are evidence of the presence of an alternate personality.

1. George Orwell. Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four [1949]: Text, Sources, Criticism. Edited by Irving Howe. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1963/1982.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.