BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, February 20, 2017

“Nineteen Eighty-Four” by George Orwell (post 5): Society’s posttraumatic multiple personality after trauma of nuclear war, not just totalitarian mind control.

Most interpretations of Nineteen Eighty-Four jump to the conclusion that it is basically an extrapolation from Nazi and Communist totalitarianism. However, the novel itself is about the double-thinking multiple personality developed by society after the trauma of nuclear war. (Real multiple personality is a posttraumatic condition.)

Toward the end of the novel, O’Brien pauses in his torture of Winston to say, “And now let us get back to the question of ‘how’ and ‘why.’ You understand well enough how the Party maintains itself in power. Now tell me why we cling to power…

“You are ruling over us for our own good,” [Winston] said feebly…

“That was stupid, Winston, stupid!…Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake…The object of power is power…It is time for you to gather some idea of what power means. The first thing you must realize is that power is collective. The individual only has power in so far as he ceases to be an individual…if he can escape his identity…” (1, pp. 174-175).

And when Winston objects that there are certain objective realities that the Party cannot control, O’Brien explains that “Reality is inside the skull…We make the laws of nature…Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them…Have you forgotten doublethink?” (1, pp. 176-177).

Thus, Big Brother and the Party are not eating power food while they feed totalitarian poison to everyone else. Leaders of the Party like O’Brien are eating their own cooking: They, too, lose their individual identities and engage in doublethink (double consciousness, multiple personality).

(Search previous post on Orwell’s “doublethink.” And past posts on “double consciousness,” “double,” and “theme of the double.”)

1. George Orwell. Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four [1949]: Text, Sources, Criticism. Edited by Irving Howe. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1963/1982.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.