BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, March 10, 2017

“Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life” by Ruth Franklin: “Jackson, who embraced ‘that compound of creatures I call Me’…kept multiple diaries simultaneously”

“As a sickly, isolated child growing up in a strict New England family, Hawthorne is said to have developed an unusual quirk: he composed an inner dialogue, divided into two personalities, that substituted for conversation and companionship. One side served as a storyteller, the other as audience, offering questions or criticisms. As a teenager, Jackson did something similar, but on the page. She kept multiple diaries simultaneously, each with a different purpose” (1, p. 36).

“She had always been moody, as nearly all teenagers are. Now, in an extension of the persona splitting of her multiple diaries, she took the unusual step of assigning names to her moods, as if they were characters in a play. The habit continued through her college years and later manifested in her fiction—most strikingly in The Bird’s Nest, her novel of multiple-personality disorder, in which a woman’s mind fractures into four distinct characters, each with her own name and defining characteristics” (1, p. 50).

“The demon in the mind. This was Jackson’s obsession, perhaps her fundamental obsession, throughout her life” (1, p. 63).

“On her last day at the University of Rochester—June 8, 1936—Jackson wrote herself a letter, addressed to ‘Shirlee’ and signed ‘Lee’: the name of a new persona” (1, p. 68).

“Soon after she began writing The Bird’s Nest, in late 1952 or early 1953, Jackson…began to suffer from headaches that often came on very suddenly…She began to lose her memory: first just a slight absentmindedness, then forgetting entire conversations…” (1, pp. 344-346). (Search “headaches,” “absent-minded,” “absentmindedness,” and “memory gaps” in this blog.)

“Then there was the question of multiple personality: what it meant…to Jackson in particular—Jackson, who embraced ‘that compound of creatures I call Me’; who teased interviewers by playing up either her housewife persona or her witchy tendencies, but always kept the writer under wraps, hidden from view” (1, p. 351).

1. Ruth Franklin. Shirley Jackson: A Rather Haunted Life. New York, Liveright Publishing/WW Norton, 2016.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.