BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, May 22, 2017

“Catch-22” by Joseph Heller (post 2): Author says that virtually none of the attitudes in the novel are based on his experiences as bombardier in World War II.

Pausing halfway through my 50th anniversary edition to read the appendix, I find the following reflections by the author:

“The concept of the novel came to me as a seizure, a single inspiration…My mind flooded with verbal images…I don’t know were it came from…the unconscious element was very strong…I deliberately looked for contradictory situations…Catch-22 became a law: ‘they’ can do anything to us we can’t stop ‘them’ from doing…

“Virtually none of the attitudes in the book—the suspicion and distrust of the officials in the government, the feelings of helplessness and victimization, the realization that most government agencies would lie—coincided with my experiences as a bombardier in World War II…

“It is the anonymous ‘they,’ the enigmatic ‘they,’ who are in charge. Who is ‘they’? I don’t know…” (1).

1. Joseph Heller. “Reeling in Catch-22.” From The Sixties, ed. Lynda Rosen Obst (New York: Random House/Rolling Stone Press, 1977, pp. 50, 52). Reprinted in appendix of Joseph Heller. Catch-22 [1961]. New York, Simon & Schuster Paperbacks, 2011, pp. 474-476.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.