BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Thursday, May 4, 2017

“The Catcher in the Rye” by J. D. Salinger (post 3): Holden Caulfield, not “crazy” or “mad”—such terms are meaningless—says “People never notice anything.”

Holden frequently calls himself “crazy” and “mad.” On the first page, he says, “I’ll just tell you about this madman stuff” (1, p. 3). On the last page, he says, “I don’t know what to think about it” (1, p. 234). One reason that Holden and most literary critics don’t know what to think about his “madman stuff” is that they use terms like “crazy” and “mad,” which do not refer to any specific mental condition.

Holden is inexplicably changeable and emotional. He has a prodigious memory for small details, but memory gaps in certain instances. He is a self-confessed liar, often for no personal gain, sometimes almost believing his own lies, which are more like fantasies than psychotic delusions. He occasionally feels like he is fading out of existence. He does things and feels things he can’t explain. He is not paranoid or incoherent. He recognizes that things he does and feels are peculiar and puzzling.

The above is not a description of schizophrenia or psychosis. It is consistent with multiple personality’s changeableness, personality switches, memory gaps, lying, and alternate personalities’ pulling the emotional and behavioral strings of the host personality from behind the scenes.

I will conclude with a comment that Holden makes (but it may not be regular old Holden): “People never notice anything” (1, p. 12). This is a common thought of alternate personalities. They like to remain incognito—by answering to the person’s regular name and pretending to be the host personality—but are continually surprised that this works, because most alternate personalities see themselves as looking quite different from the host personality, and they can’t understand why people never notice.

1. J. D. Salinger. The Catcher in the Rye [1951]. New York, Little Brown, 2014.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.