BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, August 6, 2017

Narrator Controversy of “Ulysses” by James Joyce: Literary critics, puzzled by complicated narration, do not know if it is manifestation of multiple personality.

The narration of Ulysses is puzzling and complicated:

“Many critics have many different views on the narrator within Ulysses. Some believe that the work has a traditional narrator…However, some argue that there is no narrator while others argue that there is a consistent form of narration although not necessarily in the third person…Some believe that individual characters take on the narration while others claim that Joyce is the only voice in the work…” (1).

Episodes One, Two, Four–Twelve, Sixteen, and Seventeen feature anonymous narrators. Episode Three features Stephen’s thoughts. Episode Thirteen features an amalgamation of anonymous narrator, Gerty MacDowell, and Bloom. Episode Fourteen features a variety of narrators, meant to be representative of the prose styles of historical English authors. Episode Fifteen has no narrator. Molly Bloom is the first-person narrator of Episode Eighteen” (2).

Why didn’t Joyce clearly state his intention and rationale for such puzzling and complicated narration? Was he intentionally trying to create interpretative controversy in order to stimulate and perpetuate interest by the academy? Or was the nature of his narration simply the way the novel came to him?

That which literary criticism has assumed to be the result of a purposeful attempt to be original and experimental is often a manifestation of the writer’s multiple personality. Search “pirandello,” “woolf’s waves,” and “experimental.”

The narration of Ulysses may be an example of narrative multiple personality. That is my hypothesis; opinion, pending.

2. Sparknotes. Ulysses by James Joyce: Key Facts. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/ulysses/facts.html

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.