BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, August 18, 2017

New York Times Book Review praises Sue Grafton, but does not mention her past statements that multiple personalities are integral to her writing process.

One of my past posts on Sue Grafton cites a public television interview in which she volunteers the fact that she has multiple personalities. But the interviewer disregards what she says and immediately changes the subject.

Although the New York Times Book Review (1) and other reviewers may praise novelists and love novels, they are not interested in how novelists think and how they write their novels.

Search “Grafton” in this blog to see my past posts.

1. Marilyn Stasio. “Crime Fiction: Sue Grafton Nears the End of Her Alphabet Mysteries.” New York Times, August 17, 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/17/books/review/crime-sue-grafton-y-is-for-yesterday.html?mcubz=0

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.