BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, August 21, 2017

“Steppenwolf” by Hermann Hesse (post 2): “Treatise on the Steppenwolf” tells Harry Haller, the Steppenwolf, that he has multiple, not dual, personalities.

I have just read “Treatise on the Steppenwolf,” pages 66-116 of this 389-page edition of the novel. It tells the main character—Harry Haller, the Steppenwolf—his true nature.

Harry had considered himself to have two natures, that of a man, Harry Haller, and that of a wolf of the Steppes (the plains): “…the Steppenwolf had two natures, a human and a wolfish one…[who were] in continual and deadly enmity [with each other]…and the Steppenwolf brought his own dual and divided nature into the destinies of others besides himself whenever he came into contact with them…” (1, pp. 68-72).

“There are a good many people of the same kind as Harry. Many artists are of this kind…(1, p. 74).

“It is possible that [Harry] will learn one day to know himself. He may get hold of one of our little mirrors. He may encounter the Immortals. He may find in one of our magic theaters the very thing that is needed…(1, p. 96-97).

“…to come to the point…the Steppenwolf is a fiction. When Harry feels himself to be a were-wolf, and chooses to consist of two hostile and opposed beings, he is merely availing himself of a mythological simplification…Harry consists of a hundred or a thousand selves, not of two…(1, pp. 98-100).

In psychological terms, the Treatise divides humanity into two groups: 1. the majority of people, who are multifaceted, but not distinctly self-divided, and 2. a minority of people, who are distinctly self-divided, and who may be aware of a small number of their personalities, but usually have more than they realize. In the second group are “many artists.”

The Treatise posits a spiritual realm, whose beings are the “Immortals,” and whose spokesman is narrating the Treatise. In psychological terms, the Immortals might correspond to the novelist’s muse or spiritual characters. In multiple personality, it is common to have any kind of alternate personality that would be consistent with the person’s art, personal history, religion, and culture.

1. Hermann Hesse. Steppenwolf [1927]. Translation from the German by Joseph Mileck and Horst Frenz (1963). New York, Picador Modern Classics/Farrar Straus Giroux, 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.