BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, September 4, 2017

“Little Women” by Louisa May Alcott (post 7): Jo’s father hopes she is now a “young lady,” no longer his “son Jo,” but Jo still thinks of herself as a guy.

Jo’s father has just returned from a year away in the Civil War. He is complimenting each of his four daughters, and when he comes to Jo, he says:

“…I don’t see the ‘son Jo’ whom I left a year ago, I see a young lady…” (Chapter XXII). But this would seem to be wishful thinking.

In the next and final chapter of Part I, Jo refers to herself as bearing something “like a man.” And when her older sister is about to get engaged to be married, she tells Jo that she, too, will be having relationships of the same sort. But Jo, almost seventeen, replies,

“Don’t mean to have any; it’s fun to watch other people philander, but I should feel like a fool doing it myself,” said Jo, looking alarmed at the thought.

On the last page of Part I, a friend of Jo, a boy her own age, trying to comfort Jo over the loss of her sister to marriage, says,

“Well, now, don’t be dismal, there’s a good fellow…We’ll have capital times after she is gone, for I shall be through college before long, and then we’ll go abroad, or some nice trip or other. Wouldn’t that console you?”

In this scrupulously moral family drama, he is not offering Jo anything sexual. He is considering her “a good fellow,” one of the guys, and she automatically accepts his offer from that point of view.

However, as noted in post 5, Jo has occasionally made sincere reference to herself as being a girl at heart.

In short, at nearly seventeen years of age, Jo sometimes sincerely self-identifies as a boy, but at other times sincerely self-identifies as a girl. And once again I wonder if she is a tomboy, transgender, or has multiple personality.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.