BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Monday, September 18, 2017

Multiple Personality could not be surprisingly common unless childhood trauma and imaginary companions were surprisingly common: Are they?

How plausible is it that 1.5% of the general public has clinical multiple personality (according to the psychiatric diagnostic manual, DSM-5), and that upwards of 90% of novelists and up to 30% of the general public have a nonclinical version (suggested by my study of novelists)?

For that to be plausible, two preconditions would have to be surprisingly common: 1. a natural tendency for normal children to create alternate personalities, and 2. childhood trauma (to perpetuate and amplify the children’s natural tendency to create alternate personalities).

The natural tendency for normal children to create alternate personalities is shown by imaginary companions. So how common are imaginary companions? “If we consider all cases of imaginary companions created up to the age of 7, 63 percent of the children in our study had them” (1, p. 32).

That may seem like a high figure, but the researchers interviewed both children and parents—sometimes the children didn't remember that they had imaginary companions, but the parents did, and other times the parents hadn’t known about their children’s imaginary companions—and the researchers were aware of all the forms that imaginary companions can take.

How common is childhood trauma?

“Depending on how various traumatic experiences are defined, 8–12% of American youth have experienced at least one sexual assault; 9–19% have experienced physical abuse by a caregiver or physical assault; 38–70% have witnessed serious community violence; 1 in 10 has witnessed serious violence between caregivers; 1 in 5 has lost a family member or friend to homicide; 9% have experienced Internet-assisted victimization; and 20–25% have been exposed to a natural or man-made disaster” (2).

In short, since the two preconditions for multiple personality are relatively common, it is plausible that multiple personality is relatively common.

But if multiple personality is so common, why haven’t you seen it? Because, unless you’ve been reading this blog in its entirety, you probably don’t know what it looks like.

1. Marjorie Taylor. Imaginary Companions and the Children Who Create Them. New York, Oxford University Press, 1999.
2. Benjamin E. Saunders and Zachary W. Adams. “Epidemiology of Traumatic Experiences in Childhood.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3983688/

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.