BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, September 22, 2017

“The Life of Henry Brulard” by Stendhal (post 4): First-person narrator mentions close friend, Louis Crozet, who said Stendhal had many personalities.

It is not until Chapter 30 that there is any further mention of the title name, Brulard, which the narrator says is his name, but which now seems to be a joke. However, as noted in a previous post, it is a joke with its own birthday.

It is also in this chapter that the first-person narrator, whoever he may be, talks of his close friend, Louis Crozet:

“Memories throng as I write. I’ve just noticed that I have left out one of my most intimate friends, Louis Crozet, now Chief Engineer, and a very good Chief Engineer, at Grenoble…

“Louis Crozet was cut out to be one of the most brilliant of men in Paris, and in any salon he would have beaten Koreff [a physician known in the French literary world as an expert on hypnosis (1)]…and myself as well, if one may mention oneself…he was the most intelligent and sagacious of all the Dauphinois I have known…” (2, pp. 220-221).

According to Josephson’s biography of Stendhal, Louis Crozet was “the scholarly engineer and sometime mayor of Grenoble, who had really been Stendhal’s most intimate friend” (3, p. 457).

“Crozet, who (according to Stendhal himself) ‘knew him inside out’ ” said of Stendhal: “He had not one personality but many,” each of which had its own characteristic facial expression, so that he “had at different times quite different physiognomies” (3, p. 458).

1. Wikipedia. “David Ferdinand Koreff.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Ferdinand_Koreff
2. Stendhal. The Life of Henry Brulard [1835-36]. Translated by Jean Stewart and B. C. J. G. Knight. New York, Noonday Press, 1958.
3. Matthew Josephson. Stendhal: A Biography. New York, Doubleday, 1946.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.