BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Saturday, September 23, 2017

“The Red and the Black” by Stendhal (post 5): “Julien possessed one of those stunning memories so often linked to stupidity,” hypnosis, multiple personality.

The protagonist, Julien Sorel, is introduced as a nineteen-year-old with “hypocrisy” and “determination…to make his fortune…So the thing is: become a priest” (1, p. 22-23). His type of memory is highlighted:

“Julien possessed one of those stunning memories so often linked to stupidity. To win over Chélan, the old parish priest, on whom he saw very clearly his future depended, he had learned by heart the entire New Testament in Latin; he also knew Monsieur de Maistre’s On the Pope—and had no more belief in the one than in the other” (1, pp. 19-20).

In a recent post, I mentioned the well-known association between high hypnotizability and multiple personality. And in a number of past posts I have mentioned that persons with multiple personality may have the surprising combination of both unusually good memory and unusually bad memory; that is, generally superb memory (like Julien’s), but also the absentmindedness, amnesia, and memory gaps caused when one personality does not recall what happened when another personality was in control.

For example, that combination was true of Mark Twain, who was known for an excellent memory, but also remarkable episodes of absentmindedness. (To see past posts, search “absent-mindedness” and “memory gaps.”)

Is Stendhal’s narrator correct to link “those stunning memories” with, in some sense, “stupidity”? Yes. A classic paper on characteristics of highly hypnotizable persons describes such persons as having unusually good memory—sometimes verging on total recall—but also says that their memories tend to be rote, photographic, and uncritical (2).

In short, Julien is described as having the kind of memory found in highly hypnotizable persons. And persons with multiple personality usually have high hypnotizability. So Julien’s kind of memory raises the possibility of multiple personality.

But does the type of memory ascribed to Julien foreshadow what will happen later, or is it just narrative chit chat? I will keep reading.

1. Stendhal. The Red and the Black: A Chronicle of 1830. Translated by Burton Raffel. New York, The Modern Library, 2003.
2. Herbert Spiegel. “The Grade 5 Syndrome: The Highly Hypnotizable Person.” The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis. Volume XXII, Number 4, October 1974, pp. 303-319.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.