BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Tuesday, October 17, 2017

“Based On A True Story” by Delphine de Vigan (post 3): It is never explained why the mystery character is named “L,” or who named her.

The novel ends with a classic multiple personality scenario: A manuscript for a new novel, apparently written by Delphine, is received by her editor, who loves it. Delphine, herself, has amnesia for writing and submitting it. Moreover, Delphine can find no objective evidence that a real person “L” had ever existed. Except that Based On A True Story ends with “THE END*”— the asterisk being L’s marker, which suggests that maybe L really does exist (which of course she does, as one of Delphine’s alternate personalities).

There is one thing about this novel that is truly mysterious and intriguing: the naming of the character as “L.” No explanation is ever given for referring to this character by a letter only. What was the reason?

Since there are twenty-six letters in the alphabet, the odds are against its being an accident that this character was named with the first letter of the pseudonym used by Delphine de Vigan—“Lou Delvig”—for her first novel.

So it would appear that the naming of this character (“L”), and not the asterisk, is the real clue to the true story on which this novel is based (the author’s normal version of multiple personality). But who was responsible for leaving this clue? Delphine de Vigan? Lou Delvig? Or another personality who chooses to remain nameless?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.