BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017

“The Double” by José Saramago (post 6): Narrator’s two, or two groups of, alternate personalities, one modestly transcribing, the other boldly omniscient.

As previously noted, the narrator has continually made plural self-reference—“we,” “us,” etc.—which should alert the reader to the fact that the narrator consists of more than one personality.

However, since the narrator had not yet expressed any self-contradiction, I had thought that the narrator’s multiple personalities were similar to, and in agreement with, each other.

But the following two comments by the narrator are contradictory, and therefore indicate that the narrator is composed of two, or two groups of, alternate personalities, one modestly transcribing, the other boldly omniscient:

“…do not count on us, mere transcribers of other people’s thoughts and faithful copyists of their actions, to anticipate the next steps…” (1, p. 189).

“…the privilege we enjoy of knowing everything that is going to happen up until the very last page of this story, apart from those things that might still need to be invented, allows us to say that tomorrow…(1, p. 248)…[and to offer] “a bold opinion” (1, p. 251).

1. José Saramago. The Double [2002]. Translated from the Portuguese by Margaret Jull Costa. Orlando, Harcourt, 2004.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.