BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Wednesday, April 25, 2018

“Purity” by Jonathan Franzen (post 3): More clues to Andreas Wolf’s multiple personality, and his basing personhood on secrecy and memory

In my previous post, I noted early clues to the character Andreas Wolf’s multiple personality: his dissociative fugue and reading Iris Murdoch. Additional clues—change in voice, having a different part, switching to being a different person—include the following:

“ ‘Sit down,’ he said in a much different voice” (1, p. 258).

“I have to live with what I did [murder], but part of me doesn’t regret it” (1, p. 273).

“It happened again. Again, for a second, for less than a second, before he could turn his face away, she saw a wholly different person…” (1, p. 286).

Personhood
What is the difference between just having different roles and moods (as most everyone does) versus having different personalities (as in multiple personality)? Andreas Wolf explains the difference in his theory of personhood and identity:

“How do you know that you’re a person [or a personality], distinct from other people [or other personalities]? By keeping certain things to yourself…Secrets are the way you know you even have an inside” (1, p. 275).

The reason that persons with multiple personality have memory gaps is that one personality is not aware of another personality. For example, a person has a dissociative fugue when one personality has amnesia for the period of time that another personality was in control and went from one place to another. In contrast, when a person only goes from one role or mood to another, there is no memory gap, because all the roles and moods belong to the one and only personality.

So when Andreas Wolf gives his theory of identity in terms of secrecy and memory, he is explaining a key aspect of multiple personality. And when an author has a character present such a theory of identity in the context of that character’s behavioral clues to multiple personality, it strengthens the possibility that the author was writing about multiple personality intentionally (and not just inadvertently, as many authors seem to do, in what I call “gratuitous multiple personality”).

1. Jonathan Franzen. Purity. New York, Farrar Straus Giroux, 2015.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.