BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Friday, May 11, 2018


“The Resurrection of Joan Ashby” by Cherise Wolas: The metaphor of reversible death suggests that the protagonist has multiple personality

I have just started this 531-page novel, which is the story of how marriage and motherhood suspend the career of a promising fiction writer.

My first question is about the title metaphor, “resurrection.” When I think of resurrection, I think of Jesus Christ. But since I doubt that either the author or the character has a God complex, the resurrection metaphor must imply something else. Why do I think it implies multiple personality?

Because the narrator says that the protagonist’s writing career is the function of a particular Joan Ashby, who is not the same as the Joan Ashby who marries and has children.

“It was the first Joan Ashby, the realest Joan Ashby, the one who was neither wife nor mother, that she was in immediate danger of losing” (1, p. 82).

The concept of reversible “death” is often seen in people with multiple personality. Alternate personalities who have been rendered unable to come out and perform their characteristic function are often thought of, and referred to, as “dead.” But they are not dead in the ordinary, permanent sense, because they are capable of being resurrected if the forces or circumstances preventing them from coming out are neutralized.

1. Cherise Wolas. The Resurrection of Joan Ashby. New York, Flatiron Books, 2017.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.