BASIC CONCEPTS

— When novelists claim they do not invent it, but hear voices and find stories in their head, they are neither joking nor crazy.

— When characters, narrators, or muses have minds of their own and occasionally take over, they are alternate personalities.

— Alternate personalities and memory gaps, but no significant distress or dysfunction, is a normal version of multiple personality.

— normal Multiple Personality Trait (MPT) (core of Multiple Identity Literary Theory), not clinical Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD)

— The normal version of multiple personality is an asset in fiction writing when some alternate personalities are storytellers.

— Multiple personality originates when imaginative children with normal brains have unassuaged trauma as victim or witness.

— Psychiatrists, whose standard mental status exam fails to ask about memory gaps, think they never see multiple personality.

— They need the clue of memory gaps, because alternate personalities don’t acknowledge their presence until their cover is blown.

— In novels, most multiple personality, per se, is unnoticed, unintentional, and reflects the author’s view of ordinary psychology.

— Multiple personality means one person who has more than one identity and memory bank, not psychosis or possession.

— Euphemisms for alternate personalities include parts, pseudonyms, alter egos, doubles, double consciousness, voice or voices.

— Multiple personality trait: 90% of fiction writers; possibly 30% of public.

— Each time you visit, search "name index" or "subject index," choose another name or subject, and search it.

— If you read only recent posts, you miss most of what this site has to offer.

— Share site with friends.

Sunday, May 27, 2018

“What Philip Roth Didn’t Know About Women Could Fill a Book” by Dara Horn: Shouldn’t she blame Roth’s alter egos for the misogyny of his stories?

After Roth’s recent death, this is the best essay I’ve read about the notorious misogyny of his stories, since Dara Horn, a novelist herself, is from the actual locations in which Roth’s misogynistic stories are set, and she knows for a fact that the women there are admirable.

I am in no position to debate the misogyny of Roth’s stories, since I have read Roth only to the extent I needed to discuss his multiple personality. So for the sake of argument, I accept her premise that many of his writings are rife with misogyny.

But who is to blame for the misogyny in his stories? Who wrote them? Does Dara Horn deny that Roth wrote from the points of view of one or another of various alter egos? Does she know whether all of Roth’s other personalities endorsed the misogyny? Perhaps some were as critical of it as she is.

At book signings, when authors are asked if their novel is autobiographical, they are often quick to say it isn’t, that it does not necessarily represent their own traits, actions, and beliefs.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for taking the time to comment (whether you agree or disagree) and ask questions (simple or expert). I appreciate your contribution.